首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparing the Mass, Energy, and Cost Effects of Lightweighting in Conventional and Electric Passenger Vehicles
【2h】

Comparing the Mass, Energy, and Cost Effects of Lightweighting in Conventional and Electric Passenger Vehicles

机译:比较常规和电动乘用车轻量化的质量,能量和成本效应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this work the effect of weight reduction using advanced lightweight materials on the mass, energy use, and cost of conventional and battery electric passenger vehicles is compared. Analytic vehicle simulation is coupled with cost assessment to find the optimal degree of weight reduction minimizing manufacturing and total costs. The results show a strong secondary weight and cost saving potential for the battery electric vehicles, but a higher sensitivity of vehicle energy use to mass reduction for the conventional vehicle. Generally, light weighting has the potential to lower vehicle costs, however, the results are very sensitive to parameters affecting lifetime fuel costs for conventional and battery costs for electric vehicles. Based on current technology cost estimates it is shown that the optimal amount of primary mass reduction minimizing total costs is similar for conventional and electric vehicles and ranges from 22% to 39%, depending on vehicle range and overall use patterns. The difference between the optimal solutions minimizing manufacturing versus total costs is higher for conventional than battery electric vehicles.
机译:在这项工作中,比较了使用先进的轻质材料减轻重量对传统和电动乘用车的质量,能耗和成本的影响。分析型车辆模拟与成本评估相结合,以找到减轻重量的最佳程度,从而最大程度地降低制造成本和总成本。结果表明,电池电动汽车具有强大的二次重量和节省成本的潜力,但传统能源汽车对减少能源消耗的能源使用敏感性更高。通常,轻量化有降低汽车成本的潜力,但是,结果对于影响传统燃料寿命成本和电动汽车电池成本的参数非常敏感。根据当前的技术成本估算,可以看出,使总成本最小化的一次质量降低的最佳量与常规和电动车辆相似,范围从22%到39%,具体取决于车辆的行驶范围和总体使用方式。与电池电动汽车相比,传统汽车将制造成本降至最低的最佳解决方案与总成本之间的差异更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号